@11 on Monday, 18 October 1999
Short- &
long-term effects of the relationsihp between children & their parents
Delinquency
as a product of separation
Animal work
� a later influence on Bowlby
Criteria for
secure attachment
attachment = relationships that children form, especially with parents
from cognitive � social topics
children = very dependent on adults
physical needs: parents very important
other needs: also very important � affection, love, trust
took a while for psychologists to realise this
the kinds of relationships which young children form, and consequences later on � lasting effects on various aspects of their life
short
since human babies depend completely on others for suvival
= obvious evolutionary advantages in successful social interactions with adults
long
theory: effects of early attachments
enormous influence in thought about this topic
initial work (not long after evacuation in ww2): what happened to children when separated from parents when � hospital (= major separation)
film (James Robertson - colleague): of children�s unhappiness when this happened
2-yr old girl in hosp for 2 weeks
sequence:
1. distress
2. protest
3. apathy
studied group of youngish delinquents (�the 45 thieves�)
claimed:
an unusually large number came from broken homes
had endured periods of separation from their parents
conclusions about relationship with mother: famous monograph �maternal care & mental health) � stable relationship with one adult = essential for subsequent successful social development
monotropy � from 6 months, infants attached to 1 particular person � usually the mother
but the crucial factor = whether it is a good relationship
early attachment: important because it provides children
with love
longer-term
Bowley monograph republished: child care and the growth of mother love
concerned with what happened if there is no successful relationship
argued: such a gap could be irreversible
with harmful effects on subsequent development
cited psychopathy as one possible long-term consequence (the affectionless psychopath)
Lorenz: imprinting
Harlow: cloth/wire mother
Bowlby accepted the idea of strong innate drives for social contacts with parents
(not like the ones in psycho-analytic theory)
ducks & ducklings
they get attached to a particular figure � usually the mother
showed that you can actually manipulate that by taking the mother and replacing with yourself - irreversible
fighting against the behaviourist movement in America at the time
worked very young monkeys � separated from their mothers and gave them a choice between 2 artificial mothers
1. cloth � could be held and hugged but nothing else
2. wire + nipple � provided food but not huggable
the monkeys preferred the cloth, leaning over to the wire nipple mother if they�re: close � preferred the security, not simply the mother as source of food
cloth mother as �secure base�
colleague of Bowlby � extension of his theory - experiment she devised (�strange situation)
interested in the notion of secure base/attachment
infant�s primary motivation = for security
mothers provide secure base for exploration and learning about the world
with the mother there, the babies were less fearful of things aorund them (because trusted mother to protect them)
also claimed: individ differences in this relationship: not just stable vs interrupted relatinoships, but a range of successfull/unsuccessfull relationships
pushing Bowlby away from just traumatic separation (but whole range, incl range of relats)
1970s in america: devise an objective measure (�strange situation�) of the quality of this relationship
1. active play & exploration in the caregiver�s presence
2. enthusiastic greetings on reunion after separation
3. effectiveness of contact when distressed
4. absence of anger, petulance or with-holding of contact
1. Enter room
2. Mother & baby in room
3. Stranger enters
4. Mother leaves
5. First reunion without stranger
6. Baby alone
7. Stranger re-enters
8. Second-reunion
A.�� anxious-avoidant
babies do not approach mother
do not appear to prefer her to stranger
although upset when she goes
B.�� securely-attached
approach mother, secure and play well when she is there
sometimes upset when she goes, but happy when she returns
C.�� anxious-ambivalent
do approach mother
upset when she leaves
but resists her when she comes back
Further work
prediction: sroufe (see Bremner)
showed that children in group B at 18 months are more idnpednent in classrom at 4 years than the others
mothers: also evidence that the mothers ohte 3 different groups of children behave in different ways to their childfen
evidenct that it�s not just what they�re like tat the time = a senstivie meaure of the mother/child relationship
both good: Bremner, Durkin
conclusion
works 18 months or so � much after that, doesn�t work so well
trying to find ways of looking at the relationship between children & parents when they�re older
story-stem task:
acts out story with concrete material (toys) � about a family of bears
then stops at a certain stage � asks children what will happen next
child is encouraged to identify with the child in the story
i.e. when being asked what would happen next, actually being asked what would happen in your family
Haley � child bear goes to room and finds a monster
this child doeesn�the answer, but shows the child bear toy immediately � to get mother, implying trust in mother to protect her
1. mother goes out � tells the child not to open the cupboard
2. younger sister hurts herself � there is plaster in the cupboard
�they open the cupboard�
3. mother comes back � asks the child if she obeyed her
head sinks
but eventually admits that she disobeyed her � �yes�
the child is showing evidence of a trusting relationship
Ainsworth: very influential at the time (�60s) vs behaviourists
able to show that most of what the behaviourists were saying at the time about the upbringing of young children was (maliciously) wrong
behaviourists: picking children up when they cried reinforced their crying
Ainsworth: picking them up = affection �/span> make them happier children
Ainsworth & Bell - carried out observational study: how often (and for how long) mothers repsnoded to their baby crying and how much the baby cried
= a great variation between mothers (large sample) � some ignored, some picked up every time
if behavs = right: the more mothers respond to babies crying, the more babies cry
i.e. +ve correlation between:
the number of episodes responded to by the mother
and the amount of crying by the baby
|
at 9 months |
at 12 months |
mother: episodes responded to by mother baby: frequency of babies� crying |
r = -0.42 |
r = -0.45 |
pretty strong �ve correlation
whether right or wrong, Bowlby�s ideas about the importance of stable relationships are stimulating and important
the strange situation
= a heroic & interesting attempts at an objective measure of attachment� � although we cannot be sure that it is a measure of the nature of the relationship between child & mother
(it could be simply a measure of the child�s personality which �/span> how it reacts)